On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:55 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote: > Aaron Konstam a écrit : > > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > > >> As I've said, but let me repeat it again, I do boot into run level 3. > >> After logging in I start X manually via startx. > > >>> We are having a giant miscommunication going on . What rl are you > >>> actually running at? > > >> No, there is no miscommunication, simply you just have to believe that > >> it is possible to boot in runlevel 3 and then it is possible to start > >> X manually via startx :) > > > I believe it, if you will accept that running startx puts you in to rl5 > > not rl3. > > Huh? startx is changing the runlevel? That is some news. This is a semantic argument. rl3 does not support X, rl5 does. I have never actually checked this but I would be amazed if when one runs startx the system does not switch to rl5.
But I guess I will have to try it or depend on the testimony of someone who runs startx. I have been amazed before. -- ======================================================================= Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take Hofstadter's Law into account. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [email protected] _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
