On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 11:11 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > I just published the "inhibit" branch, but I decided to just apply your > patch anyway and use the dbus-settable inhibit in parallel with your > signal method.
OK. I think your method isn't perfect for the mesh-inhibits-companion case, because if the mesh were to set that property on the companion then that decision could be overridden by some other process sending a dbus message. Thanks for merging both! I saw your "merge autoconnect inhibit logic" patch -- another way you could implement that is to make each NMDevice respond to its own autoconnect-allowed signal, based on the value of priv->autoconnect_inhibit. > However, we do want to probably handle the Manager stuff differently, > but I"ll work on that. Thanks! Daniel _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
