On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 15:49 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote: > Hooker, Jonathan a écrit : > > > Although it stays running in the background, you don't have > > full control over the software without manually editing config files > > and restarting NM and even then it can be flaky. NM does not truly > > have a CLI. This being the case, I would also pose the question, are > > there any plans to go down the route of providing a CLI that would act > > as a front-end interface to the already running back-end daemon? > > There is an "NM CLI" discussion thread only a couple of weeks old.
There's already Martin's cnetworkmanager, and we'll likely try to start getting something going using C a bit later this summer. It's a very often requested feature, and it's something NM should definitely have. It makes a lot of sense to have both higher-level language bindings (cnetworkmanager) and lower-level ones (C-based) so that people can pick the right tool for the right job. So yeah, there's progress on this front. Dan _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
