On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:31 -0400, John Mahoney wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:07 -0400, John Mahoney wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Martyn J. Pearce > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apogolies if re-asked, I have searched the > mailing-list > > archive to no avail. > > > > I am running a new ubuntu install on a netbook > (Eeepc surf), > > with wired & > > wireless networking available, both domestic > > manually-configured networks (no > > dhcp). I have added Manual profiles to both wired & > > wireless. I cannot get > > the default gateway (192.168.0.12) to configure, > however. > > > > I add two routes in the route config panel; one for > > 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > (no gateway), and one for 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 (gateway > > 192.168.0.12). Having left > > the edit dialogue, and applied, there is no > difference to the > > routing table as > > displayed with route -n. If I re-enter the routes > edit panel, > > I find that > > it's collapsed the routes into one, being > > 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 (gateway > > 192.168.0.12); but there's no hint of the gateway in > the route > > config. > > > > > > Did you try adding the Default gateway to the Addresses > section of the > > ipv4 settings tab instead of the routes section. > > Also, If you have both wired and wireless interfaces active, > I > > believe, it will always use the wired default route first if > possible. > > > The routes dialog doesn't take 0.0.0.0, because that's the > default > route, and NM manages the default route. Here's what you > do... > > > There should probably be some error checking in the add routes section > so that the address 0.0.0.0 can not be added > to avoid future confusion. At least on Ubuntu 9.04 it allows me to add > such routes.
Yeah. Dan _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
