Why not? Why bother having two different ways of doing something? 2009/11/4 <[email protected]>
> Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:54 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote: >> >> >>> I notice that if I stop the NetworkManager service: >>> /etc/init.d/NetworkManager stop >>> that the interfaces started by NetworkManager are not always stopped. >>> >>> Note: this is a F12 qemu-kvm guest with multiple (two) NICs defined. >>> >>> Bug or "feature"?? >>> >>> >> >> Feature. It allows you to do 'service NetworkManager restart' and have >> the connection survive. This is implemented for wired static and DHCP >> interfaces only and was requested quite a few times by people who run >> headless servers where you may need to update NM on-the-fly and not be >> kicked out when doing so. It's also necessary for NM to seamlessly take >> over a connection from the initrd where the rootfs is network mounted. >> >> Dan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetworkManager-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list >> >> > Why would anyone use NM on a server or on a diskless node? > (Just wondering...) > > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list >
_______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
