On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:28 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > Hi All, > > Created a patch and it works for me. > > More details on the comment in the bug.
Committed and pushed to master and stable 0.7, thanks. Dan > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:38 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I have a situation where vpnc is failing due to an incorrect > setting in > > the NetworkManager vpnc plugin. The situation is a > condition where a > > firewall or other non-NAT device is interfering with > protocol 50 (esp) > > and we need NAT-T even though we are not behind a NAT. As > it so > > happens, vpnc does support this. It's "NAT Traversal mode > force-natt". > > In those environments, cli invocation of vpnc works like a > charm. But > > there appears to be no way for the NetworkManager vpnc > plugin to > > configure and use this. The force-natt option is most > likely to work in > > the widest variety of environments at the cost of a slight > overhead (UDP > > encapsulation). OpenSWAN, StrongSWAN, Racoon, and vpnc all > support > > this. Just need the plugin adapted to support it as well. > Any chance > > of getting that added to that plugin? > > > Seems pretty simple; to make sure it doesn't get lost I've > created: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611027 > > Can't promise when, but it would be a good simple bug for a > new > contributor to pick up. > > Dan > > > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
