Dan Williams a écrit : > It's complicated. Previous mechanisms didn't have a daemon running in > the background actively managing the network. So there was nothing to > restart. Unfortunately using Unix signals there's no way to really > express "terminate but don't take stuff down".
Using sigaction() you can give the semantic of your choice to any signal. Correct if I am wrong but a lot of daemons already do that to implement things like "/etc/init.d/foo reload". > We could however use a D-Bus call to do so, or something like that and > keep -TERM as taking interfaces down. Unix signals are infinitely inferior to D-BUS. Yet they look like the right tool for this simple job, don't they? Implemented one way or the other, this new "quit" feature would be nice. _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
