On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:56 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Alexey Torkhov wrote: > > >> It would definitely drag in openswan as dependancy even if not used. But > >> I think I would prefer that over having two different plugins. > > > > This will bring there advanced ppp settings dialog (similar to one in > > pptp plugin), pppd plugin/etc. Also, a requested feature is to support > > openl2tpd. > > > > Won't this unnecessary bloat openswan-nm plugin? > > I'd still prefer that over two different possibly conflicting plugins.
But there also exists NetworkManager-strongswan plugin. So it's not the first possibly conflicting plugin. Anyway, merging two plugins sounds like a good idea. I'll look into openswan-nm. Alexey _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
