Em Sunday 03 July 2011, Lamarque Vieira Souza escreveu:
> Em Saturday 02 July 2011, Dan Williams escreveu:
> > Yeah, the applet and editor are two separate processes. We can send an
> > Update() along anyway if you wish though, I simply had to make a
> > behavior call at the time it was implemented, and we can change that
> > behavior. Obviously agents should be smart enough to know when the
> > incoming secrets are different than what they already have and possibly
> > ignore the Update() if nothing has actually changed.
> >
> > If NM is passing the old secrets, that's clearly not cool, and we need
> > to fix that.
>
> Well, a new Update() call is not necessary, I just need NM to call
> Update() with the new secrets instead of the old ones. The attached patch
> does exactly that and fix the problem for me. But NM's API does not allow
> me to list all settings from a connection, I have to name them one by one,
> so I created the patch only for NMSettingWirelessSecurity. I think you can
> improve it to work with all other secret settings, right?
Dan Willians, can you comment the patch I sent you last week? This
problem is a show-stop for Plasma NM and I would like to have it solve as soon
as possible.
--
Lamarque V. Souza
http://www.geographicguide.com/brazil.htm
Linux User #57137 - http://counter.li.org/
http://planetkde.org/pt-br
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
