On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 17:36 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 14:02 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >> The versioning of libnl is an utter mess, and in some environment, > >> pkgconfig will fail to find headers and libraries due to newer .pc file > >> name confusion. Ship around this by checking for both libnl-1.pc and > >> libnl-3.0.pc. > > > > Is this against git master or the libnl3 branch? > > master. I was not aware of any libnl3 branch. What's the plan with > this? Will it be merged before 0.9 release?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/log/?h=libnl3 Right after 0.9. It's a pretty big change with routing and addressing so I don't want to destabilize 0.9 at this point, even though the code in the branch is working pretty well for me. Alfredo did a great job with the compat bits, so after the merge NM should work with libnl 1.1, 2, and 3, and finally, 4 years later, we've moved into the modern libnl age :) Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
