On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:57 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > By Dan's request, I just tried the ipunblock branch on my home network. > Sending my feedback to the list - also by Dan's request. > > My home network currently uses SLAAC for IPv6 addressing and > Information-Only DHCPv6 for DNS server advertisement (no RDNSS Option > present in RAs). Also standard DHCPv4 for IPv4. I connected using Auto > for both IPv4 and IPv6 modes, with the «Require IPv(4|6) for this > connection to complete» settings both disabled.
I've just pushed a fix for what I believe was the problem shown in your logs. Can you test? Thanks again! If that goes well we can tackle the SLAAC+DHCP bits which you posted a while back, and after that, hopefully it's ready to merge. Dan > So what happens is that as soon as the DHCPv4 transaction is complete, > the device is reported to be activated by the systray applet as well as > in the logs, as expected. The IPv6 activation continues in the > background, also as expected, however after it has finished it goes on > to report that «RA-provided address no longer valid», and then «failed > (reason 'ip-config-unavailable')». The device is then brought down, the > transaction restarts, and after a few attempts it successfully stays > activated. However, when it does, resolv.conf does *not* contain the > IPv6 name servers. > > The symptoms of this bug is eerily similar to the one I fixed in «[PATCH > v2] ip6-manager: Fix SLAAC/DHCPv6 interaction» (which is NOT applied), > however in this case stateful DHCPv6 simultaneously with SLAAC, so I > kind of doubt they have the same root cause. > > I've attached the syslog from the initial networking activation until > the connection became stable, plus a PCAP of RS/RA/DHCPv6 packets in the > same time period. Any ideas what is going on? (The system is F15, and > the F15 NM RPM specfile was used - I only replaced the original source > tarball with one containing the ipunblock branch). > > Best regards, > _______________________________________________ > networkmanager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
