On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 10:45 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 19:12 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > Could we drop this property and just use the 'type' setting of the > > connection to determine what type of slave this is? ie, if 'master' is > > set and 'type == 'bond'' then this is a bond slave, no? It seems like > > most of the time the 'slave-type' value will correspond to the same > > value as 'type'. Thoughts? > > After re-reading the patches, disregard this... slaves won't be > type=bond since that's what the master is; the slave would just be > type=ethernet or whatever (well, until we get vlans on top of bonds on > top of bridges :)
The fact that we are going to support multiple levels of nesting is exactly the reason why I have put in "slave-type". BTW, feel free to notice me before you start merging the patches so I can repost. I have been rebasing the patches and made small corrections and enhancements in the meanwhile. _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
