On 15 November 2011 10:45, Joseph Gunn <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:19:13 +0200 > Uwe Geuder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Probably the implementers of the N900 reasoned a bit like me: Because >> entering the PIN is not relevant at the AT modem interface of the phone >> at all, they just return ERROR instead of implementing anything real. > Is it possible that the phone/computer link is bluetooth? Depending > on the setup that may require a PIN? No, I absolutely don't think so. Any potential bluetooth PIN is handled at a completely different protocol level inside the bluetooth stack, not with AT commands at modem level. In the first posting there was an ERROR reponse to an AT command. Regards, Uwe _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
