On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 21:28 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:18 -0400, Eric Shienbrood wrote: > >>>> I can look at doing that. What should we call it? I think MSISDN is a > >>>> GSM term. How does GetPhoneNumber() sound? > >>> > >>> Hm, old message. Yes, that method sounds fine. > >> > >> Where did this end up? > >> > >> Also, AT+CNUM may report a list of numbers, not just one. > >> > >> For the 0.6 API I was going to add it as a "PhoneNumbers" property > >> (signature 'as') in the Modem interface. > >> > >> Anyway, in my own tests, it really didn't report any number, as some > >> others noticed. :-/ > > > > Well IMHO if you are going to get the values from +CNUM, you should also > > allow > > setting of it, would you agree? Essentially it's a list of SIM contacts, > > other > > than that it having a dedicated AT command to get/set as it's in a > > different > > phonebook, there's not really anything special about it. > > Given that we have a "Contacts" interface in the 0.6 API, maybe we could > handle own numbers, if retrievable, as any other number in the different > available phonebooks.
CDMA devices always have a command (either AT or QCDM/DIAG) to return the MDN since it's stored in the phone and not on a SIM (unless you have a RUIM of course, then it's on the RUIM I think). For the GSM devices, it's often programmed as phonebook #0 but that's easy to change, delete, or screw up. So I think there's value in exposing the current phone number where we can get it, if we can't then we should probably leave it blank. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
