On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:02 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > On 02/13/2012 09:33 PM, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote: > > > Will this redesign allow you to change the udev rule assigned names > > > > > > from > > > ID_MM_ZTE_PORT_TYPE_MODEM > > > to > > > ID_MM_PORT_TYPE_MODEM > > > etc? I don't think there can be any clash requiring a different > > > namespace as the items are fully identified by Vendor / Product IDs > > > already. > > > > That is fine for me, but not sure if there is any reason for the vendor > > namespace in port-type tags. Dan? > > I think it's fine too; the question at the time was whether or not > different modems had different port needs. I think for now we have > enough information to standardize the udev port type tags between > vendors. > Excellent news, I guess that's a 0.6 thing only? Are you changing anything else in the udev tagging, say AUX -> AT/QCDM or adding GPS port etc?
Thanks, Andrew _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
