On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 21:41 -0300, José Queiroz wrote: > In fact, you should plan your firewall policy a little better. You > have two systems doing exactly the same thing. Is this really > necessary? >
Hi José, My old laptop was stolen last year and it just had some iptables rules set-up on it ages ago. After scrimping and saving for a few months I managed to buy a new laptop and I thought I'd use something with a gui interface and installed firestarter. It flooded my logs with an average of one message/minute. So I started reading up again about iptables and voila, it can use the ulog daemon. So I put together a set of rules, etc. installed them and now everything iptables drops is logged to /var/log/ulog/syslogemu.log and syslog, etc. is back to "normal". However, firestarter is still capturing one or two attempts each day which means I need to fine tune "my" set of rules for iptables. Then I can remove firestarter. An alternative would be for firestarter to load only user defined rules or for it to use the ulog daemon. Cheers, Rob > Em 9 de março de 2012 18:41, rob stone <[email protected]> > escreveu: > Please ignore previous e-mail. > I have found the "problem". The firestarter firewall alters > iptables > when it is launched. All I have to do is alter the init.d > sequences so > my script starts last. > > Cheers, > > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > networkmanager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > > > _______________________________________________ > networkmanager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
