On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 17:22 -0500, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre > <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- > > src/dns-manager/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c | 3 ++- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/dns-manager/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c > > b/src/dns-manager/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c > > index 6314438..8e216f4 100644 > > --- a/src/dns-manager/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c > > +++ b/src/dns-manager/nm-dns-dnsmasq.c > > @@ -308,7 +308,8 @@ update (NMDnsPlugin *plugin, > > argv[6] = "--listen-address=127.0.0.1"; /* Should work for both 4 > > and 6 */ > > argv[7] = "--conf-file=" CONFFILE; > > argv[8] = "--cache-size=400"; > > - argv[9] = NULL; > > + argv[9] = "--proxy-dnssec"; /* Allow DNSSEC to pass through */ > > + argv[10] = NULL; > > Of course, I should have added the rationale for this> > > Bug-Ubuntu: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/946093 > > This will allow DNSSEC data to be visible in browsers, which would otherwise > not be the case by default because of dnsmasq acting as a middle-man for > resolution. > > Otherwise, we have a regression from the libc resolver behavior.
Pushed, thanks. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
