Hi Howard, Quoting Howard Chu (2012-05-06 17:09:11) > Killing and restarting dnsmasq each time you need to make a change has all > the > elegance of a kick in the groin. Problems like this wouldn't exist if you > used I totally agree, but it’s necessary at the moment to make my system work.
> DBUS to manage dnsmasq. > > If my previous patch is a problem because you don't want to rely on an > existing system-provided dnsmasq instance, the obvious solution is to add an > option to dnsmasq to have instance-specific DBUS services, not to start/stop > your private instance repeatedly every time the network topology changes. Sounds good. I’m not a NM developer, so I can’t say any more than that :). Best regards, Michael _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
