On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 07:32 -0400, Thomas Graf wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:18:26AM -0400, Andrew Mahone wrote: > > On May 15, 2012 7:20 AM, "Thomas Graf" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It use the same format as the initscripts. Seeé > > > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/System_Administrators_Guide/s1-networkscripts-interfaces.html > > > > > > > > > > > I have a bonding connection set up with type=bond, and a bond section > > > > in its config: > > > > [bond] > > > > interface-name=bond0 > > > > > > DEVICE=bond0 > > > > > > > mode=active-backup > > > > > > BONDING_OPTS="mode=..." > > > > > > ~Thomas > > > > So, do I then also need to switch to using the ifcfg-rh plugin, which > > I would have to force to build as I don't use a Red Hat derivative? > > None of the Fedora docs describe things that I actually have on my > > system, and adding these items to the existing keyfile-plugin-based > > system connections has no effect. > > Bonding support is currently only available using the ifcfg-rh plugin.
Well, and 'keyfile' which automatically supports everything we add to NM. But we're also trying to support anything ifcfg-rh has historically supported too. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
