> Is it safe to assume that response processor(s) can handle NULL gchar*? > I guess we need to check that in response processors as well. >
Yes, there aren't so many response processors out there, as they're only used during probing time (once the modem is created we use mm_base_modem_at_command|sequence). The ones I checked will only assume that response is valid if error is not set, so actually not a big deal also to pass an empty string instead of NULL, but still I think we should use NULL to indicate that error is set, so that we make a difference between reporting an error and an empty AT reply. -- Aleksander _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
