> From: "Stuart Gathman" <[email protected]> > The problem is, I don't want the auto IP, *or* the private IPs.
I'm sorry but you would have to express this idea better. DHCPv6 is one of the methods to serve automatic addresses and DNS information. > I just > want the DHCP6 IP. But when I select "DHCP only" in NM, it then DHCP only is a bad name and the method itself is broken and will most probably be removed from NetworkManager. > assigns > only the DHCP IP, but no route! If you don't have any route, you don't need the IP either as it will not be used for any network communication. > The behaviour I expect with DHCP only > is to still assign the route from RA. That'c correct. That's how it works. > But perhaps the routes cannot > be separated from the IPs in the kernel? They mostly are. > I don't see why not, since the RA routes are *link* scope IPs, > and don't depend on what global scope IPs are assigned. I.e., > shouldn't setting accept_ra = 0 and > accept_ra_defrtr =1 work? Nope. It is not possible to use default gateway from RA that is not accepted. > Here are my default routes: > > default via fe80::21a:a0ff:fe3a:a6ff dev wlan0 proto static metric > 1 > default via fe80::21a:a0ff:fe3a:a6ff dev wlan0 proto kernel metric > 1024 expires 1781sec > > The static one is created by NM - and seems to be what the OP is > complaining about, as it takes priority over the automatic route, > which These are both the same. > breaks things when the router changes (although nothing a > disconnect-connect won't fix). Known bug. > In either case, they don't depend on any global IP. Correct. Cheers, Pavel _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
