On a related note, since ModemManager already uses AT+CRSM to read ICCID and operator name/ID, I wonder if it makes sense to "AT+CRSM=176,28423,0,0,9" instead of AT+CIMI for reading IMSI, or use it as a fallback solution if AT+CIMI fails or is not supported by a modem.
At least on one modem I have, "AT+CRSM=176,28423,0,0,9" is far more reliable than AT+CIMI (which may be an issue in the modem firmware). - Ben _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
