On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:57 -0600, Robby Workman wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:49 -0600 > Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite > > a while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support > > libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that are being added > > to NM like bridging, bonding, vlan, etc. > > > > So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for almost a year > > (2012-01-20), and most major distros are packaging it (Ubuntu, > > OpenSUSE, Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, Arch), would anyone object to libnl > > >= 3.2.7 as a build requirement for the next release of > > >NetworkManager? > > > We've got 3.2.11 in the last stable Slackware, so sure, that's fine > with us, even if we're not "major" enough to warrant concern ;-)
Aww, not true. Thanks for the update; by "major" I really mean those that don't have derivatives. eg Mint would be a derivative distro, but Slackware would be a major one. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
