On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Aleksander Morgado <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 03/01/13 20:13, Ben Chan wrote:
> > Also, based on my experiments, the modem sometimes seems to hang when
> > running AT+COPS=?. This patch avoids AT+COPS=? from being issued when
> > the modem is in LTE mdoe.
>
> From what I can see, it also avoids the Scan when the access tech is
> unknown:
>
> +    if ((access_tech == MM_MODEM_ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UNKNOWN) ||
> +        (access_tech & MM_MODEM_ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_LTE)) {
>
> So you're really limiting the scanning for networks only to when the
> modem is already connected to a given network which is not LTE. I don't
> think we shouldn't ban from scanning when access tech is UNKNOWN.
>
>
I include UNKNOWN just to be safe as there may be a period of time when the
access technology is not yet determined.

Also, the reply to AT+COPS=? may really take a loong time; you sure it
> gets stuck?
>
>
>From what I've seen before, the scan operation timed out and the modem
didn't respond to AT commands anymore. However, that's not frequently
reproducible.


> I wonder how the scan works when the Novatel LTE modem is handled by the
> QMI driver. IIRC Dan said we wouldn't need this specific plugin any more
> once the modem is handled by the QMI implementation.
>
>
I haven't tried the QMI driver for this modem, but wonder if it behaves in
a similar way as the limitation is most likely a firmware issue.


> --
> Aleksander
>
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to