I've rebased patch v3 on top of HEAD, so that patch v4 can be applied cleanly on HEAD.
Dan, how do you think about the timeout? Thanks, Ben On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Aleksander Morgado <[email protected]>wrote: > > Looks better now. > > Dan, any further comments? You were concerned about the value of the > timeout IIRC, should we increase it? I don't think there should be any > problem with having a longer timeout, as we're just hiding the real > registration state to the whole system, so a longer timeout here > shouldn't break anything. > >
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
