On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 13:11 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 11:51 PM, Arman Uguray wrote:
> > Added "qmi_wwan" as one of the supported drivers for the Gobi plugin.
> >
>
> Is there any modem which doesn't work without this fix?
>
> I know it seems a clear fix to do, but it may have some side effects.
> The drivers filter was thought for the qcserial case, so that if we ever
> detect a modem with ttys handled by qcserial, we decide it's a Gobi
> modem. Now, the filter is exclusive, if the Gobi plugin accepts the
> port, it won't be accepted by any other plugin. And we don't want all
> QMI-powered modems being grabbed by the Gobi plugin (e.g. ZTE modems
> *suck* at QMI, so we never actually run them in QMI mode)...
Would this make the Gobi plugin potentially grab Pantech QMI devices too
(eg uml290), depending on plugin load order? There's actually quite a
few devices that are driven by qmi_wwan that *aren't* Gobi devices.
Dan
> > ---
> > plugins/gobi/mm-plugin-gobi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/plugins/gobi/mm-plugin-gobi.c b/plugins/gobi/mm-plugin-gobi.c
> > index 6f2280d..ac32ae8 100644
> > --- a/plugins/gobi/mm-plugin-gobi.c
> > +++ b/plugins/gobi/mm-plugin-gobi.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ G_MODULE_EXPORT MMPlugin *
> > mm_plugin_create (void)
> > {
> > static const gchar *subsystems[] = { "tty", "net", "usb", NULL };
> > - static const gchar *drivers[] = { "qcserial", NULL };
> > + static const gchar *drivers[] = { "qcserial", "qmi_wwan", NULL };
> >
> > return MM_PLUGIN (
> > g_object_new (MM_TYPE_PLUGIN_GOBI,
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
