On 04/10/2013 04:13 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Dan Williams <[email protected]> writes: >> On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 21:56 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: >>> Dan Williams <[email protected]> writes: >>>> On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 15:20 -0400, Nate Pleasant wrote: >>>> >>>>> As a side note, I'm also working with the new Verizon Pantech UML295 >>>>> modem, which is turning out to be vastly different than the UML290. You >>>>> can see the work I've done so far in the link below. >>>>> >>>>> https://bitbucket.org/accelecon/modemmanager/wiki/PantechUML295 >>>> Oh fun, one of those. Does it support QMI or AT or DIAG at all, or is >>>> it solely Web-based? >>> This part caught my eye: >>> >>> http://192.168.32.2/management >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>> <picaso >>> version="1.0.0"><p-question><uri>http://192.168.32.2:80/management</uri><id>unknown</id></p-question><p-answer><time>2013-03-28T15:33:55.219Z</time><id>UML295_ea5eb1d8-ce40-498a-b061-eb02f110255e</id><component>wireless</component><subcomponent>cdma</subcomponent><subcomponent>gsm</subcomponent><subcomponent>lte</subcomponent><management><interfacemodes><active>ecm+hid >>> </active><available>ecm+hid >>> </available><available>rndis+hid >>> </available><available>rndis+hid+serial+acm+diag >>> </available><available>diag+adb+acm+serial+rmnet >>> </available><available>diag+adb+acm+serial+wmb >>> </available><available>mbim+hid >>> </available></interfacemodes><current><name/><description/><version>CC46F</version><size>0</size><time/><state><value>idle</value><description> >>> >>> </description><percentage>0</percentage><error/></state></current><available/><ready/><installing/></management></p-answer></picaso> >>> >>> >>> So it looks like it supports a number of different modes, including a >>> couple with adb(!) and also a mbim mode. Which I find interesting, but >>> which might not be that useful with MM yet. >>> >>> I expect the "rmnet" function supports QMI. But what's "wmb"? >>> >>> Anyway, better not play with any mode without "hid" (which I assume is >>> the web interface), as we don't know how to switch modes then. Although >>> I guess the diag+adb+acm+serial+rmnet mode is the closest one to the >>> UML290? >> Wouldn't adb imply it's running Android inside? > Likely, but not necessarily. It would sure be interesting to poke > around with adb shell, if supported. > >> Also, look at the HID >> descriptors from the lsusb output, they look really weird (Belgian? >> Arabic?). I wonder if they are actually valid and useful. > Right, so "hid" in the interface mode list was really HID. I just > assumed it was a function name for the web service. Well, then we don't > know which of these modes support the web service or not. It's tempting > to guess that it always is present regardless of network function type. > But then again, it might not be. > > Yes, the HID descriptors look weird and I don't understand what they are > supposed to be used for. Some sort of vendor specific monitor > application support, using HID reports maybe? > > > Bjørn Dan/Bjorn,
If we're going to continue this further, perhaps it would be best to open another mailing-list discussion with a new topic. I'm about to head out for the day, but I'll be in the #nm IRC chatroom tomorrow if you want to do some testing with this modem. We can even play around with trying to switch the mode. The UML295 I have is a test device that our company owns, so if we somehow brick it or need to get a replacement, that's okay. Nate Nathaniel J. Pleasant | Accelerated Concepts | Developer www.acceleratedconcepts.com _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
