Aleksander Morgado <[email protected]> writes: > On 07/05/13 17:33, Bjørn Mork wrote: >>> and I don't think we should do >>> > that e.g. for ZTE QMI modems (which are not handled with QMI currently, >>> > as they suck). >> I'm wondering about this... Except for the ones which appear as routers >> and run some buggy QMI proxy daemon, I'd expect most of the ZTE modems >> to have about the same set of bugs as the other Qualcomm firmware based >> modems. Modems like e.g. the MF821D look and feel pretty much like any >> other MDM9200 based device. > > I have a ZTE MF637 which is QMI based, and it just ends up crashing if > used with QMI. I even have a branch to enable ZTE-based QMI modems > (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/log/?h=zte-qmi) > but didn't spend much time with it after my first unsuccessful attempts...
Is this a device designed to operate as a NATing router, or is it just a "regular" modem? The MF60 I've still got (luckily the owner seems to have forgotten about it :) is also crashing really bad on any QMI WDS command, making it completely useless with QMI. But this device is a wifi-3G router which it obviously runs some QMI proxy daemon, forwarding most commands but intercepting WDS. And the ZTE WDS implementation sucks bigtime even for a modem firmware. But I was hoping we could detect and avoid the troublesome devices using "safe" commands, without making all other devices suffer. As I said, the MF821D works really fine with QMI. Bjørn _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
