On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 13:23 -0500, dag dg wrote:
> Appears to be working now. When I initially did this it was showing
> the card as available. Then when I clicked on it to connect, it
> connected in the background, but if you were to check nm-applet it
> shows under "Mobile Broadband" 2 entries of "not enabled". While in
> this state if you check ifconfig you'll see wwan0 with an IP and if
> you test it you will see that you are connected.  For the "not
> enabled" entries, the first one is greyed out(where the signal
> strength indicator normally goes, like AT&T LTE then shows the bars)
> and then the second one is clickable. If you click on it it pops up
> with an error message basically stating that "this interface is not
> managed by Network Manager". After restarting Network Manager though
> this issue seemed to go away(it shows the AT&T connection even after
> connecting along with the strength and will let you disconnect), and
> after a reboot it was working fine as well; I'll keep an eye out and
> see if the behavior comes back. Outside of that everything appears to
> be working.
> 
> On the Fedora side I'm not sure what the roadmap is for getting this
> pulled; libqmi isn't even available as an RPM yet. However on my end
> I'm a happy camper; it's working fine in nm-applet now I just have to
> get a startup script to load the right modules and assign the right
> device addresses.

libqmi is proposed for review but there always needs to be somebody that
does the review, and that only seems to be possible via horse-trading.
That said, we could just pull in MM with a private copy of libqmi and
libmbim until the official packages get approved :)

Dan

> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Aleksander Morgado
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 08/05/13 10:29, dag dg wrote:
> >> Yes, per Dan's advice I compiled MM > NM > nm-applet. Is there a flag
> >> I can pass to autogen to force it to compile modemmanager-1? Also
> >> despite these checks into Network Manager, would they really cause
> >> Modem Manager to behave this way? I can understand the device not
> >> showing up in network manager, but for modem manager to change the
> >> device status to "disabled" is odd. Can those "InvalidQmiCommand" and
> >> "Firmware not supported" warnings be safely ignored? Also if you check
> >> the modem-manager debug output you'll see an entry of:
> >>
> >> modem-manager[18566]: <warn>  [1368000178.829043]
> >> [mm-iface-modem-3gpp.c:1948] load_imei_ready(): couldn't load IMEI:
> >> 'Device doesn't report a valid IMEI'
> >>
> >> I've checked with dell and verified that this is a proper IMEI but
> >> then again they could be wrong...
> >
> > There is no issue in any of those logs. The modem goes *always* to
> > 'disabled' state when initially detected; you would then enable it with
> > network-manager-applet.
> >
> > You can try to pass --with-modem-manager-1=yes to the NM's autogen.sh.
> > That will fail configure if libmm-glib is not found. Make sure you have
> > mm-glib.pc in the default pkg-config path...
> >
> > If this is a 64 bit system, you may want to pass --libdir=/usr/lib64 to
> > every autogen.sh; including the MM one.
> >
> > --
> > Aleksander


_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to