On 05/16/2013 07:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> > > What's bizarre is that a Gobi 1k with really, *really* old QMI (2009)
>>> > > works just fine with the exact same command sequence.  So it can't
>>> > > really be related to old vs. new QMI version, just that some devices
>>> > > with some versions of WMS perhaps want a specific TLV?
>> > 
>> > The only TLV that we don't pass to List Messages is the one specifying
>> > which message tags you want to query (e.g. I want only
>> > QMI_WMS_MESSAGE_TAG_TYPE_MT_READ). When that TLV is not set, the modem
>> > should return all messages. Maybe the modem really wants that TLV, and
>> > if so, we would need to loop querying for all 4 known tags for each
>> > message store.
> Yeah, that's the problem.  Setting that TLV makes the command return
> "Success" on the ADU960s, but I'm not able to actually *see* any
> messages using MT_READ or MT_NOT_READ.  Also, when sending an SMS, all I
> get from the ADU960s is the "Transfer Route MT Message" indication,
> which MM currently ignores.  That data looks like it contains the PDU,
> right?  Maybe this firmware simply can't store the message to NV so it
> indicates it to the host and then discards it, and that's why it doesn't
> show up in SM/NV storage?

Not even the SM storage? :/ Did you try to create a SMS, store it in SM
storage (--store-in-storage=sm) and then --send it?


-- 
Aleksander
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
  • [no subject] David Castellanos
    • Re: Aleksander Morgado
      • Re: David Castellanos
        • Re: Aleksander Morgado
          • Re: Aleksander Morgado
          • Re: Re: Dan Williams
            • Re: Aleksander Morgado
              • Re: Re: Dan Williams
                • Re: Aleksander Morgado
                • Re: Re: Dan Williams
                • Re: Re: Dan Williams
                • Re: Aleksander Morgado
                • Re: David Castellanos
                • Re: Aleksander Morgado
                • Re: Aleksander Morgado
                • Re: David Castellanos
                • Re: Aleksander Morgado
                • Re: David Castellanos
                • Re: Aleksander Morgado

Reply via email to