Hey Poma, On 08/06/13 09:02, poma wrote: > OK, that can be overcome via 'ID_MM_DEVICE_IGNORE' within a custom rule. > As for this device, > http://www.koutech.com/proddetail.asp?linenumber=56[1] > 'ID_MM_DEVICE_IGNORE' *must* be applied, if we want to prevent scanning > connected ups and nut-driver/server breakage. > And all this as a result of > /lib/udev/rules.d/80-mm-candidate.rules > SUBSYSTEM=="tty", ENV{ID_MM_CANDIDATE}="1" > Therefore 'ID_MM_PLATFORM_DRIVER_PROBE' is redundant, in the first > place, in this case. > > mmcli --version > mmcli 0.7.991 > > > poma > > > [1] > DEVPATH=/class/pci_bus/0000:01/device/0000:01:06.0 > DRIVER=serial > ID_MODEL_FROM_DATABASE=1P2S > ID_PCI_CLASS_FROM_DATABASE=Communication controller > ID_PCI_SUBCLASS_FROM_DATABASE=Communication controller > ID_VENDOR_FROM_DATABASE=MosChip Semiconductor Technology Ltd. > MODALIAS=pci:v00009710d00009835sv00001000sd00000012bc07sc80i02 > PCI_CLASS=78002 > PCI_ID=9710:9835 > PCI_SLOT_NAME=0000:01:06.0 > PCI_SUBSYS_ID=1000:0012 > SUBSYSTEM=pci
I don't think we should probe devices in the 'pci' subsystem unless whitelisted with ID_MM_PLATFORM_DRIVER_PROBE. Can you grab this patch, replace 'pnp' with 'pci' and retest? https://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2013-June/txtfYzWozQRdF.txt -- Aleksander _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
