On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:47 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > This code was broken when it landed with commit > fcc441622ae2632b9b36f352621cfd3baf34dc85 ; it was then later > updated with 2318b3c5252403a52973eae70c32ff715c7994e7 > > But the assertion is just clearly wrong - if we're going to clear the > previously queued state transition anyways, let's stop warning about > it.
It's more there because it's potentially a bug if something double-queues, and I'd like to see that indication so we know that it happens, otherwise it's harder to track down. Any instance of this is technically a bug. What are you seeing it for? Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
