Hey Tore,

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> wrote:
> By dcbw's request, here's some logs plus mmcli output from a Nokia
> 21M-02 that's usually failing to be recognised as an Icera device and
> handled by the nokia-icera plugin. What seems to happen is that either
> it's too slow to respond to AT%IPSYS? or the fact that it echoes that
> command back before actually responding makes MM erroneously conclude
> it's not an Icera stick. In one of the logs the %IPSYS response isn't
> visible at all, in the other it comes in too late, after MM has logged
> "Modem is probably not Icera-based".


Hum... so in 'log1.txt', ttyUSB5 does indeed return a valid AT%IPSYS?
response, but too late. And in 'log2.txt' none of the ports return a
valid response to that command, only ERROR. I believe we should both
extend the timeout of the AT command, and setup some retries logic in
case the ports return ERROR. The whole probing time for the device is
pretty low (<3s) so it shouldn't harm to add some retries for that
command.

Filled in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725294

Thanks for the logs :)

-- 
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to