Am 09.02.2015 um 11:20 schrieb Lubomir Rintel:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thanks you for the patch.
> 
> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 01:31 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Only install nm-settings-ifcfg-rh.5 man page if the ifcfg-rh
>> configuration plugin has been enabled. It's confusing to have this man
>> page around on e.g. a Debian based distro.
>>
>> See attached patch.
>>
>> There might be small issue here, i.e. if you build the release tarball
>> and you don't have ifcfg-rh enabled, then the nm-settings-ifcfg-rh.5 man
>> page would be missing from the release tarball as it's not added to
>> EXTRA_DIST
>>
>> If that is a concern, please let me know and I'll rework to the patch to
>> always unconditionally build and dist the man pages, but only install
>> them conditionally.
> 
> The distribution tarball contents indeed should not depend on the
> configuration configuration options. Please rework it the way you
> suggest.

On second thought, the pre-generated man pages are removed on "make
clean", so the release tarball can't be built twice in a row.
So I wonder if we should bother at all to ship pre-generated man pages.
After all, xsltproc is not that an uncommon dependency.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to