On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 18:49 +0200, matti kaasinen wrote: > Thanks Beniamino for your answer, Actually I noticed that None > signature and tried fixing it like you suggested without any luck. > Error message I discussed in my previous message was coming from > statements that had proper signatures. It seems that there is bug in > NM 1.0.10 related to this 'address-data' property. It can't be > present when settings are updated. Update succeeds if I have > 'addresses' property present (what previous error message suggests) > and deleting "address-data" property from settings read with > .GetSettings() method. > > Actually now the procedure is similar as it used to be in NM 0.9.8.10 > with the exception of deleting "adderss-data" property from settings. > Procedure did not work after updating from NM 0.9.8.10 to NM 1.0.10 > and I made a wrong assumption that "addresses" property had become > from "deprecated" to "obsolete".
We "deprecate" properties, but they are supposed to continue to work indefinitely. As much as possible, deprecated properties are not removed and continue to work with future versions. Of course, you are encouraged not to use them anymore! "address-data" is a replacement for deprecated "addresses". It supports additional options that cannot be expressed in "addresses". If you don't need those, in principle it's fine to use "addresses". But better don't :) "address-data" was introduced by https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=d16905df633ceea08c93b6e982f660627d06ff34 and is in 1.0.0 release (or newer). I certainly would expect that what you did works. I don't know why it wouldn't. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
