On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:52 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Thomas Haller <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 10:59 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > > I posted a while back about not being able to set the gateway for
> > > static routes in VPN connections to the tun/tap/ppp interface,
> > > and a
> > > great hint to just set it to 0.0.0.0 was given.  That has worked
> > > in
> > > the latest NetworkManager in F25.
> > > 
> > > It accepts the gateway and will work as expected, but every time
> > > I
> > > edit the connection afterward, I have to re-fill in my gateways
> > > on
> > > every individual route again - per connection.  If I never need
> > > to
> > > edit a VPN, no issue, but unfortunately I need to often edit
> > > them.
> > > This behavior just started (recently anyway - not sure the exact
> > > commit).
> > > 
> > > Happens on all types (vpnc, openconnect, pptp).
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > -Greg
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Note that in nm-connection-editor a gateway of "0.0.0.0" is
> > identical
> > to leaving the field empty. Thus, if you edit a connection to have
> > gateway 0.0.0.0, next time when revisiting the connection the
> > gateway
> > is cleared.
> > 
> > Thomas
> 
> That is true, but when I edit it again, it requires me to re-enter
> 0.0.0.0 before I can save it.  Would it be possible to add this as a
> feature request to not have to add a gateway address (for manually
> enetered routes) at all in the GUI?

doesn't happen to me. Either I am testing something different then you,
  or you are using an older version of the GUI, where a bug got fixed
recently.

Can you describe exactly where you are clicking? And which nm-
connection-editor version are you using? Or is it gnome-control-center?

Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to