Thanks for the feedback, Francesco. I tried your suggestion but it's the
same.
We'll get some TRACE level logs and post them

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Francesco Giudici <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Florin,
>         nice to have wpa_supplicant logs.
> As a first step I would give a try disabling MAC address randomization
> in NM. In you NetworkManager.conf:
>
> [device]
> wifi.scan-rand-mac-address=no
> wifi.cloned-mac-address=permanent
>
> then restart NM.
>
> Maybe would be better to open a bugzilla for this to trace and attach
> all related logs (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/). TRACE level logs for
> NetworkManager could be of help too:
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/
> plain/contrib/fedora/rpm/NetworkManager.conf?id=master
>
> Thanks
> Francesco
>
>
> On 31/03/2017 06:59, Florin wrote:
> > Observed the same behavior with NM 1.6.2
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Florin <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     And here are the wpa_supplicant logs:
> >
> >     Mar 27 14:20:30 cdeeb95 systemd[1]: Starting WPA supplicant...
> >     Mar 27 14:20:31 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: Successfully
> >     initialized wpa_supplicant
> >     Mar 27 14:20:31 cdeeb95 systemd[1]: Started WPA supplicant.
> >     Mar 27 14:20:31 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: Libgcrypt warning:
> >     missing initialization - please fix the application
> >     Mar 27 14:20:34 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:21:51 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:21:51 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Failed to
> >     initiate AP scan
> >     Mar 27 14:21:52 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:21:52 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Failed to
> >     initiate AP scan
> >     Mar 27 14:21:53 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:21:53 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Failed to
> >     initiate AP scan
> >     Mar 27 14:21:54 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:21:54 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Failed to
> >     initiate AP scan
> >     Mar 27 14:21:55 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:21:55 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Failed to
> >     initiate AP scan
> >     Mar 27 14:22:44 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:23:47 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:24:50 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >     Mar 27 14:25:54 cdeeb95 wpa_supplicant[859]: wlan0: Reject scan
> >     trigger since one is already pending
> >
> >
> >     On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Florin <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >         Some more details:
> >
> >         # rfkill list
> >         0: phy0: wlan
> >                 Soft blocked: no
> >                 Hard blocked: no
> >
> >         # nmcli radio
> >         WIFI-HW  WIFI     WWAN-HW  WWAN
> >         enabled  enabled  enabled  enabled
> >
> >         On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Florin <[email protected]
> >         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >             Here is also how my system-connections file looks like:
> >
> >             [connection]
> >             id=conn
> >             type=wifi
> >             autoconnect=true
> >
> >             [wifi]
> >             hidden=false
> >             mode=infrastructure
> >             ssid=mywifi
> >
> >             [wifi-security]
> >             auth-alg=open
> >             key-mgmt=wpa-psk
> >             psk=mypass
> >
> >             [ipv4]
> >             method=auto
> >
> >             [ipv6]
> >             addr-gen-mode=stable-privacy
> >             method=auto
> >
> >
> >             On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Florin <[email protected]
> >             <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >                 Hi all,
> >                 I have a strange issue with NetworkManager 1.4.2 with a
> >                 wifi chipset using the wl18xx kernel module.
> >                 I have the system-connections set-up but NM won't
> >                 automatically connect. It will only connect if I use
> >                 "nmcli con up <conenction name>".
> >                 On the other hand, using a wifi usb dongle, such as the
> >                 raspberry pi official dongle, which uses a BCM43143
> >                 chipset, autoconnect to the same network works as
> expected.
> >
> >                 logs are these:
> >
> >                 Mar 27 14:20:31 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624431.3859] device (wlan0): state change:
> >                 unavailable -> disconnected (reason
> >                 'supplicant-available') [20 30 42]
> >                 Mar 27 14:20:35 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624435.4733] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: ready -> inactive
> >                 Mar 27 14:21:13 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624473.0366] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: inactive -> scanning
> >                 Mar 27 14:22:44 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624564.9449] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: scanning -> inactive
> >                 Mar 27 14:22:49 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624569.0186] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: inactive -> scanning
> >                 Mar 27 14:23:47 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624627.9367] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: scanning -> inactive
> >                 Mar 27 14:23:52 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624632.0417] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: inactive -> scanning
> >                 Mar 27 14:24:50 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624690.9474] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: scanning -> inactive
> >                 Mar 27 14:24:55 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624695.0190] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: inactive -> scanning
> >                 Mar 27 14:25:53 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624753.9617] device (wlan0): set-hw-addr: set MAC
> >                 address to 1E:2D:A8:4C:19:94 (scanning)
> >                 Mar 27 14:25:54 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624754.4841] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: scanning -> disabled
> >                 Mar 27 14:25:54 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624754.5031] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: disabled -> inactive
> >                 Mar 27 14:28:05 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624885.0367] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: inactive -> scanning
> >                 Mar 27 14:29:03 29bc430 NetworkManager[709]: <info>
> >                  [1490624943.9366] device (wlan0): supplicant interface
> >                 state: scanning -> inactive
> >
> >                 Any clue?
> >                 Thank you
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > networkmanager-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
> >
>
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to