Hi. Thanks for your response!
2017-05-18 11:32 GMT-04:00 Thomas Haller <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 22:13 -0400, Nikolay Martynov wrote: >> If slave connection is a wifi connection we should still display it >> Otherwise this AP gets scanned regardless, but when user clicks it >> new >> network is created in NM's configuation - which is unlikely what user >> desired > > Hi Nikolay, > > I see what the patch does, but I am not convinced that it's the right > thing to do. > > In a way, it changes > https://git.gnome.org/browse/network-manager-applet/commit/?h=0abe8a8f46bcdce5907882ba355ec69156b33164 > > Other opinions? Just to clarify: this patch only affects wifi bonded connections. 'Classic' ethernet bond slaves are still skipped - so this change should not affect existing users. I think the intention of original patch was to hide ethernet ones. The problem with wifi slaves is that they are not hidden since they actually come from scan results - they still pop up in the list of available APs. And this is the good thing - this means I can connect and disconnect wifi bond slave at will from the applet. So, with this in mind - could you please clarify why you think this is not the right thing to do so I could try to address that? :) Thanks! -- Martynov Nikolay. Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
