On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:56:39PM +0200, Beniamino Galvani wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Ulrich Ölmann wrote: > > This is expected behaviour now, right? (Because of connection "link-local" > > using > > a UUID inside its parent property and this UUID being found in a connection > > that > > has been applied to a different device than what link-local's actual parent > > is?) > > Again explicitely using "parent=eth0" gives me what I want. > > Yes, I think this is expected, as the link-local device already exists > when NM is started and has a different parent. In this case it is > better to specify an interface as parent.
Okay, that sounds plausible. And once more: thanks for your willingness to help! :) Best regards Ulrich -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
