On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:20:28 +0200
Thomas Haller <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 11:07 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Azure (and probably other VM environments), there is a desire to
> > cause guest VM to renew DHCP
> > lease in response to host infrastructure changes. These include
> > things like spinning up
> > lots of VM's then suspending them and later unfreezing them as
> > needed. The other scenario
> > is doing renew following migration.
> > 
> > The current kernel code has a hack to try and simulate link bounce,
> > but it doesn't
> > work very well and the old ISC DHCP client does nothing. Network
> > manager might be
> > able to do something better??  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> link bounce might not work with NetworkManager, in the current form.
> 
> NM has a 5 seconds grace period, during which it ignores carrier going
> away. It does so because the link can go down unexpectedly for unknown
> reasons.
> Actually, after NM changes the MTU, the 5 seconds are extended to 10
> seconds, because [1].
> So, kernel would have to bounce the link for at least 10 seconds.
> 
> Then there is a setting ignore-carrier (`man NetworkManager.conf`).
> That causes NM to totally ignore when the link goes down. That setting
> is quite common, for example on the package "NetworkManager-config-
> server" enables it by default on RHEL.
> 
> Appart from the above obstacles, carrier going away causes the active
> connection to disconnect. Later, another (or the same) connection may
> autoconnect again. So, that sounds like what you requested, but I don't
> think it works well.
> 
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487702

One alternative would be to the hyper-v daemon (doing other services)
could invoke a hook or script to request network manager do a renew?

Attachment: pgp9aPIm3gyXj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to