On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 16:01 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am 13.03.22 um 12:46 schrieb Thomas Haller: > > On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 21:55 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/girepository-1.0/NMA4-1.0.typelib > > > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnma-gtk4.so > > > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnma-gtk4.so.0.0.0 > > > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libnma-gtk4.pc > > > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnma-gtk4.so.0 > > > ./usr/share/vala/vapi/libnma-gtk4.vapi > > > ./usr/share/vala/vapi/libnma-gtk4.deps > > > ./usr/share/gir-1.0/NMA4-1.0.gir > > > > > > yes. I think it's fine. is there a problem? > > > > You cannot load gtk3 and gtk4 in the same application, and > > consequently, you cannot load libnma.so (gtk3) and libnma-gtk4 > > together. > > > > libnma is a GUI library based on GTK. It seems not unreasonable > > that > > the GTK version is part of the library name -- in particular, as > > there > > might come GTK5 in the future. > > > > These are really two different libraries (with very similar API and > > the > > same underlying sources). > > I see the necessity and maybe this is just bike shedding on my side > but > I'd personally prefer the gtk part being dropped, so the soname > becomes > libnma-4.so.0 > And correspondingly libnma-4.pc (libnma4.pc would be fine as well). > > Or do we have some prior art where the gtkX string is encoded in the > library soname? > > I also find it a bit inconsistent that the gobject instrospection > files > do not have GTK string embedded.
Hi, I tend to agree. but it might be too late for that... even if it was announced as experimental :) Lubomir, wdyt? best, Thomas _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
