On Thursday, January 09, 2014 11:47:51 Andreas Berger wrote: > hi everyone, > > i'm setting up neurodebian for our lab, and i'm wondering whether to > install AFNI from upstream or via apt. as i understand it, upstream > provide daily builds, with no versions marked as 'stable' or otherwise > recommended. previously it was up to the users in our lab to upgrade AFNI, > and to not upgrade it during a project. my question is: how frequently is > AFNI updated in neurodebian? how is the version chosen? do you recommend > apt-pinning AFNI for the duration of a project to avoid inconsistencies? > is there some sort of documented policy where i could look up these > questions? > > curious to see how others handle this > > regards, > andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Neurodebian-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neurodebian-users
EDIT: i just realized that 'apt-pinning' does not mean what i thought it means. what i meant was holding a package, i. e. forcing it to not be upgraded. for example: aptitude hold afni _______________________________________________ Neurodebian-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/neurodebian-users
