On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Do we think this warrants another tag and roll? Recall that it > implies a bump up to 1.3.19... It's only a warning, not an error: unless there is really a bug there, I don't think it matters. As long as .18 works as-is (and it seems to for me, at least) I'd just fix it in CVS for .19. James.
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready for t... Aris Stathakis
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready f... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, rea... Aris Stathakis
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled... Aris Stathakis
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and ro... Aris Stathakis
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and ro... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and ro... Aris Stathakis
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready for testing Brad Nicholes
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready for testi... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready for t... James A. Sutherland
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready f... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, rea... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready for testi... Tony Finch
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready for t... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready f... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, rea... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, rea... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, ready f... Martin Kraemer
- Re: 1.3.18 is tagged and rolled, rea... Jim Jagielski
