From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:01 PM
> > Doesn't this remove the advantage of using apr_time_t's? The whole point
> > of that format was that we were using microseconds instead of seconds. If
> > that is our goal, then why don't we just change what an apr_time_t is?
> apr_time_t should maintain 1 microsecond resolution (there are legit uses for
> it). Reducing resolutions should be a runtime or compile time option for
> folks who want speed at the expense of function.
and be localized to httpd, please, not infesting apr. If we want to provide an
apr_now_rough() for ~1s resolution (your 1s event clock clearly might not trip
on the precise rollover from second to second) then I'm +1... but we can't
change the existing definition.
