From: "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 11:18 PM
> put in Allow from 127.0.0.1
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough - yes 127.0.0.1 does work, localhost does not.
Seeing as localhost should parse through dns lookup, this would be a bug.
> >Works. Actually, I think it boils down to:
> >
> >Allow from localhost
> >
> >being broken on win32. s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ resolves the problem.
> >Since it's seeing the request from 127.0.0.1 it never parses out the
> >.rowe-clan.net allowance.
> >
> >More experimenting to do. BTW... the ServerName 127.0.0.1 is for s&!+,
> >it's not even commented out. I will eliminate it without objection tommorow
> >morning.
> >
> >Bill
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:59 PM
> >Subject: Re: 2.0 broken semantics?
> >
> >
> >> What happens when you place Allow from All at the bottom.
> >>
> >> >This code fails:
> >> >
> >> ><Location /server-status>
> >> > SetHandler server-status
> >> > Order deny,allow
> >> > Deny from all
> >> > Allow from localhost
> >> > Allow from .rowe-clan.net
> >> ></Location>
> >> >
> >> >The result is always denied. Any ideas?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
