(thanks for reminding me Paul) ...
where are we with a Filtered ap_rput semantic v.s. a non-filtered, r->bb dependent
semantic? We needed a patch either way to finish this, if I'm remembering right.
If we still can't agree, let me point out one thing. If it's a filter, it needs
to be documented in the right places so folks don't go inserting a filter into
the wrong spot. If it's r->bb, it needs to be documented so folks don't go creating
another brigade.
I'm at the point where the most obvious docs that will keep bugs reports to a
minimum wins the day, in spite of my opposition to extra filter layers.
Bill
