From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:15 PM > Not tested, but I am +1 for taking the chance and including it in the build. > Hav eyou tested to make sure CGIs work still? If it breaks anything, I would > expect it be 95/98. Sorry... just recovering from a crashed mbox monday. This is in the NT/W2K only code path, won't affect 95/98. Already committed.
- Diagnosing W2K service bugreports William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Diagnosing W2K service bugreports Bill Stoddard
- Re: Diagnosing W2K service bugreports William A. Rowe, Jr.
- [PATCH 1.3] Diagnosing W2K service bugreports William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH 1.3] Diagnosing W2K service bugre... Victor J. Orlikowski
- Re: [PATCH 1.3] Diagnosing W2K service b... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH 1.3] Diagnosing W2K servi... Martin Kraemer
- Re: [PATCH 1.3] Diagnosing W2K service bugre... Bill Stoddard
- William A. Rowe, Jr.
