On 1 Mar 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote: > dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > why do you start more than one process in the default configuration? > > > > -dean > > Heck, I don't know... I suggested 1, Ryan wanted 2 or 3. 1 still > makes the most sense to me. I suggested 2 or 3 just for a bit of redundancy. In the current model, there are likely to be problems, and I think we should acknowledge that fact. If we go with 1, and that process seg-faults due to code in the MPM or the core, we take the hit of starting a second child. If we start 2, then one can die and we still have one in reserve. I do think that once the code has been being exercised for a while, we could set this to 1. Just like we started MaxRequestsPerChild at 30 in 1.3, and just bumped it to 1000 (i think). I just want to be a bit more conservative until the code has been stressed more. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
