RE: [RFC] InodeEtag option

[Joshua Slive]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Dietz, Phil E. wrote:

> No one has replied.  Any opinions ?
>

I don't see why this is being implemented as an "Option".  What is the
harm of adding another directive?  Problems with the "Option" approach:

1. The options syntax is confusing overall.

2. I still believe this implementation is contrary to the way that other
Options work, although I have not looked at the code in detail.

Joshua.