Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi guys,
> I thought this may be of interest to the mailing list.
> ..Ian
yeah!!!! thanks for sharing!!!
I did get my gdb on Linux to sort-of work against a thread. I'm
shocked at the number of mutex calls. Heck, even glibc sprintf()
calls pthread_mutex_lock().
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 thread... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 th... Bill Stoddard
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 th... Greg Stein
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2... Jeff Trawick
- Re: some reasons why Apac... Greg Stein
- Re: some reasons why Apac... Jeff Trawick
- Re: some reasons why Apac... Greg Stein
- Re: some reasons why Apac... David Reid
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 thread... Ben Laurie
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 th... Greg Ames
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower ... Jeff Trawick
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is slower ... John Thompson
- Re: some reasons why Apache 2.0 threaded is sl... Forest Come-Peace
